I've now had several requests to take on Edward Feser's Five Proofs of the Existence of God (2017). Often the people making those discoveries, or those around them, are quick to say, "Don't worry. In extreme cases where death seems inevitable, you could reform from random quantum fluctuations as a Boltzmann brain. Brierley's first attempt to dismiss multiverse theory is to appeal to an illogical argument from Luke Barnes.Barnes argues (pp. . A Physicist Explains Why Humans Probably Didn't Pop Into Existence Last ... As we have seen, brain plasticity is the ability of the nervous system to, through a modification of synaptic pathways, modify its biological, chemical and physical properties according to the needs and influence of the environment. Maybe Craig is hiding behind the excuse of Dillahunty not having a Doctorate . creation - How do young earth creationists reconcile the age of the ... What is the ultimate conspiracy and was it ever debunked? The fate of the universe—heat death, Big Rip or cosmic consciousness? Jinan points out that these numbers, repeated as "fact", are merely a result of misuse of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. There has even been speculation that a "brain", dubbed a Boltzmann brain, could be created in this context. Post-Debate Reflections - Sean Carroll Well, that has been computed at 10 10 50 years. Blogs, . The technology and knowledge of a civilization only 1,000 years ahead of us could be as shocking to us as our world would be to a medieval person. Sean M. Carroll Some modern cosmological models predict the appearance of Boltzmann Brains: observers who randomly fluctuate out of a thermal bath rather than naturally evolving from a low-entropy Big Bang. For example, move the person in room #1 to room #2, room #2 . That power amounted to 22 GW which was 29 % of their nameplate rating. Summary of Paper: In around 50,000 words, this paper provides a scientifically and philosophically careful treatment of the fine-tuning argument for divine creation of the cosmos, addressing most of the major criticisms of the argument in the process.